So talking to @Inkwell; today he believes that all the feedback on this idea was negative. From what I can see the only negative feedback was people who didn't originally understand what was being proposed, and that otherwise there were only seen to be good things to come from this. It's been months and months since this was first given the go-ahead by Matt and all feedback from people who've actually read and understood it (including news staff and management) points to it being worthwhile, yet today I was told that in the anonymous news feedback that no-one ever saw a few people said they read news but don't use the forum and that in the manager's eyes is reason enough to completely do away with plans to bring the community closer and make discussion on news articles something that actually occurs.
It requires no coding and very little extra effort on the part of staff, and would not only potentially bring new people to the forum but (importantly, if news is to carry on claiming that it's a real department) get more people reading the articles and having discussions about them. We don't have compulsory registration on the forum so anyone who just wants to read and not join in can still do so, there is literally no reason not to go ahead with this other than management stalling because it means doing some work








Reply With Quote






. However, I would most definitely look at rare values and news reports if we revert back to V5.