PDA

View Full Version : Anelka to chelsea - done



piddle2k6
11-01-2008, 05:03 PM
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/c/chelsea/7175749.stm

15 mill is alot?! Bit overpriced imo

jesus
11-01-2008, 05:06 PM
football is ALL overpriced

Jordie
11-01-2008, 05:08 PM
i think he'll be brilliant for them

jesus
11-01-2008, 05:11 PM
lolol is there any white peeps left on chelseas team?

danny-dyer
11-01-2008, 05:13 PM
lolol is there any white peeps left on chelseas team?
Frank lampard
John terry
cech


dumb ****.

jesus
11-01-2008, 05:14 PM
soz but i dont follow football it was just a query

danny-dyer
11-01-2008, 05:18 PM
orite soz

FlyingJesus
11-01-2008, 05:18 PM
Woooo been needing a new forward for a while, Pizzaro is crap and Shevchenko, despite being one of the most skilled around, doesn't always play that well at Chelsea. A good buy :)

edible
11-01-2008, 05:20 PM
Oh how I am looking forward to playing Chelsea again..:rolleyes:
Bit overpriced there.

Jordie
11-01-2008, 05:36 PM
soz but i dont follow football it was just a query

dont follow football but yet you comment things which are totally untrue?
u clearly know nothing.. sorry to be a bit harsh but im used to it on the 606 boards commenting on our situation ( luton town ) but they dont know the facts and get it all wrong

Minstrels
11-01-2008, 05:43 PM
Good luck to Chelsea. Anelka is sooooooo moody!

Paulio
11-01-2008, 05:46 PM
Wow, aint that more than Henry went for?

He's 29/30 aswell aint he? You can tell Chelsea have money to burn because there paying 15m + 50/80k per week wages just for another two years out of him.

Mortalized
11-01-2008, 06:47 PM
Well done rent boys

Disaronno
11-01-2008, 06:51 PM
Wow, aint that more than Henry went for?

He's 29/30 aswell aint he? You can tell Chelsea have money to burn because there paying 15m + 50/80k per week wages just for another two years out of him.

Not 100% sure but i thought Henry went for £16m

Geraint
11-01-2008, 08:10 PM
Chelsea have bought a player who, when Drogba comes back, will not get in the side. Chelsea play the 4-3-2-1 with Drogba up front alone. Spell on the sidelines, me thinks.

Jackbee
11-01-2008, 08:24 PM
I think anelka is over-rated. I will be suprised if he gets regular matches at chelsea.

He has been bought just beacause of there worries playing without drogba.

Paulio
11-01-2008, 08:27 PM
Chelsea have bought a player who, when Drogba comes back, will not get in the side. Chelsea play the 4-3-2-1 with Drogba up front alone. Spell on the sidelines, me thinks.

4-3-3 with attacking midfielders, I agree. Could this mean he's going to try and go to 4-4-2? If it does that means there will be more big named signings! :P

@xP
11-01-2008, 08:39 PM
I think anelka is over-rated. I will be suprised if he gets regular matches at chelsea.

He has been bought just beacause of there worries playing without drogba.

And they are using him only for the african nations cup.

Pointless signing tbh.

piddle2k6
11-01-2008, 08:43 PM
dont follow football but yet you comment things which are totally untrue?
u clearly know nothing.. sorry to be a bit harsh but im used to it on the 606 boards commenting on our situation ( luton town ) but they dont know the facts and get it all wrong

Sounds like people at my school who just oh bournemouth are **** they never win blah blah blah.

I wish people would learn about something before opening their trap :rolleyes:

PS: Blackwell got a future job lined up?

Alan_Carr
11-01-2008, 08:53 PM
good player, good deal.

Geraint
11-01-2008, 09:27 PM
4-3-3 with attacking midfielders, I agree. Could this mean he's going to try and go to 4-4-2? If it does that means there will be more big named signings! :P

Chelsea play better with the two wide midfielders. If Chelsea play the 4-4-2 don't be surprised if they bid for Berbatov.

Kieeran
11-01-2008, 09:33 PM
I bet he rarely gets played.

Disaronno
12-01-2008, 12:01 AM
Chelsea play better with the two wide midfielders. If Chelsea play the 4-4-2 don't be surprised if they bid for Berbatov.

I think Berbatov will only go to Chelsea if they offered better pay than Manchester. Manchester will make a great signing if he goes there. I still dont like Chelsea.... i think they buy threats. They buy players like Anelka because he can score, and win games for bolton. They never buy players because they want to, or was that just Mourinho. They shouldnt be allowed to spend so much money. Wasn't it £30m for Sean Wright-Phillips? He wasnt even worth £5.5m

Naruto!
12-01-2008, 12:14 AM
I think Berbatov will only go to Chelsea if they offered better pay than Manchester. Manchester will make a great signing if he goes there. I still dont like Chelsea.... i think they buy threats. They buy players like Anelka because he can score, and win games for bolton. They never buy players because they want to, or was that just Mourinho. They shouldnt be allowed to spend so much money. Wasn't it £30m for Sean Wright-Phillips? He wasnt even worth £5.5m
Most clubs buy strikers because they can score.. :rolleyes:

Aflux
12-01-2008, 12:17 AM
That made no sense dude; of course you buy players because they're a threat...

FlyingJesus
12-01-2008, 12:23 AM
Yeah if they're a threat it's because they're good, so you'll want them :S

Smiddy
12-01-2008, 12:33 AM
People keep blurting on about Berbatov being a good player, he's only good against rubbish clubs. You want a striker who can consistantly score against the bigger clubs (the top 4 namely) and I think Anelka does that regularly.

But you're all right, he won't get into the squad once Drogba returns, unless he plays in Joe Cole's position like he can do.. not likely.

Disaronno
13-01-2008, 02:19 AM
Yeah if they're a threat it's because they're good, so you'll want them :S


That made no sense dude; of course you buy players because they're a threat...

No, what i meant was that they ONLY buy them so that other clubs dont have a good player. They do it as thats the only way they can win. Its opinions and this one is hard to explain. Spesh when half of the users on here are sarcastic and arrogant.

No btw that is not directed at you 2.

FlyingJesus
13-01-2008, 05:41 PM
I'd agree with you if it was anyway. I get your point and agree to an extent - it's not the only reason they buy players but in some cases that is why they're paid so much for people. Still, it's tactical so fair play to them :P

Disaronno
13-01-2008, 09:14 PM
Ya, but thanks for seeing the point, some people just dont and say "OmgDZ yew R a N@Bz!"

Want to hide these adverts? Register an account for free!