Match of the day.

[Andys]

Why do they have to show the games from the "big 4" near the start?
Even when they're absolutley ****e games, then they show the small teams last - even if it's a cracker of a game. :rolleyes:

It really pisses me off :/

[Tristan]

...
Liverpool were kinda near the end. Like, the middle-latter part of the show.

[Minstrels]

Think of City, last week City didn't even play. It was all Chelsea for 15 minutes.

[Geraint]

Errrr, because more people want to see it?

West Ham were on first, anyway. Just because Sunderland weren't on first.

[Andys]

Errrr, because more people want to see it?

West Ham were on first, anyway. Just because Sunderland weren't on first.
How predictable.
How wern't Liverpool on last? They were absolute balls.

[Geraint]

How predictable.
How wern't Liverpool on last? They were absolute balls.

They had 39 shots and a disallowed goal. It's a good result for Stoke, maybe that's why.

[Andys]

It's a good result for Stoke, maybe that's why.
Still a boring match though :rolleyes:

[Geraint]

Still a boring match though :rolleyes:

The order means nothing. Some games that are second have 5 minutes air time and the 5th game could have 10.

[Andys]

It's usuauly the games on first have ages then the games on last don't have very long?

[Geraint]

It's usuauly the games on first have ages then the games on last don't have very long?

Not always.

[RareIce]

Not always.

most of the time it is always, i think the big 4 are most of the time always on 1st. MOTD 2 its gunna be easy to tell whats gunna be on their 1st tommorrow but thats obvious, but even when utd or chelsea play someone else they are on 1st.

[brandon]

Because more people generally want to watch the Top 4.

[Funya Chin]

Stop complaining because Sunderland wasn't shown first.