PDA

View Full Version : Post your clipboard



HotelUser
11-12-2008, 09:41 PM
~/.cairo-dock/themes/

Andys
11-12-2008, 09:45 PM
nothing :P

Javascrypt
11-12-2008, 09:45 PM
http://www.habboxforum.com/showthread.php?t=543298
when i showed ingoe about my find and he lold!

AlexOC
12-12-2008, 01:32 AM
I shouldn't xD.

Blinger1
12-12-2008, 04:36 AM
that sucks doesn't it?

swilson
14-12-2008, 07:54 AM
http://www.jamberoo.net/

HotelUser
20-12-2008, 09:04 PM
</td><td class="v">

illegal
20-12-2008, 11:03 PM
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=AWggPLXeOkU

scottish
20-12-2008, 11:04 PM
http://www.habboxforum.com/showthread.php?t=546076

Patt
20-12-2008, 11:04 PM
Hello Elmarshal,
i have the following users to report.

1)
Member: .YourName
Here is an unedited screen shot i took.
*removed
i find offense in the following statements;
- You're the biggest f*** i've seen here
( So he's not only insulting me, he's also insulting other Homosexual members)
- Just because you're Australian
( He's stated here that because im Indigenous Australian i must be a ***.)
- You're slow in the head.
( no explanation needed)

2) Member: KyleEnos
here is another uneditied screen shot i took
*REMOVED*
i find offense in the following statements;
- Wagon jumping t***.
i feel this is a directed attack amongst my people and i.
Wagon Jumping is considered an insult to my native brothers and i.
Wagon Jumping reffers to the oppression of whiteman amongst the Indigenous Australians, we had our own wagon once (it was called Australia), and we we're forced to jump on the foreign, whitemens wagons and abide by there wagons rules. Starting the oppression of my people.


All i ask is, LET MY PEOPLE GO!

~ Lots of Aboriginal Love
Patt aka Derhain.


Please ignore all of it. i wrote it to piss some people off at RZ

Blinger1
21-12-2008, 12:40 PM
user_times

CokeZoneCodes
21-12-2008, 12:42 PM
how to humiliate pervs on webcam

Blinger1
21-12-2008, 12:42 PM
makes sense

j4k3
25-12-2008, 11:17 PM
What are you on

alotest
26-12-2008, 08:25 AM
----------

Fart
27-12-2008, 03:23 PM
http://rapidshare.com/files/164487619/*********************.part4.rar

i blocked it so im not advertising warez ^_^

camera
27-12-2008, 03:38 PM
-nothing

BeanEgg
27-12-2008, 03:39 PM
http://voice-overs.co.uk/uk/

TETRIS.exe
27-12-2008, 09:36 PM
ads_mall_window
ads_mall_tele

http://www.puhekupla.com/img/mall_window_tele.gif

Ikkuna ei ole "oikea" toimiva ikkuna (ainakaan vielä).

The window is not a "real" working window (at least not yet).


EDIT:

Lisäksi / also

ads_clfloor

http://www.puhekupla.com/img/idea_matto_iso.gif

ads_cllava / ads_cllava2

http://www.puhekupla.com/img/ads_cllava_anim.gifhttp://www.puhekupla.com/img/ads_cllava2.gif


Kommentit (19) (http://www.puhekupla.com/palsta.php?subaction=showcomments&id=1229690789&archive=&start_from=&ucat=3&)
Logic



Lol
Puhekupla ftw!

santa
01-01-2009, 06:32 PM
http://img81.imageshack.us/my.php?image=pinkmodefu5.png

LMAO FAIL

Britvic
01-01-2009, 11:22 PM
Checking for existence of config file at C:\Program Files\7digital Locker\config\config.xml
Loading config string...
Config string loaded...
Strings loaded...
_sortAutorunMenu
Sending call to load domains...
Loading of domains succeeded.
All ready called...
In beginApp function.
Checking download location - C:\Documents and Settings\Owner\My Documents\7digital Locker Downloads\

Xarea
01-01-2009, 11:26 PM
http://www.viruz.com/spiderman-tattoo.jpg

Blue
01-01-2009, 11:28 PM
http//www.rapidtunes.net

Andys
01-01-2009, 11:34 PM
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=5gaG1_xXzd4

Havoline
04-01-2009, 04:57 PM
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20071202004735AAnaDjd (http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20071202004735AAnaDjd)

Physics :)

Stupid.
09-01-2009, 09:31 PM
Iglue + Hartly - In this city

Urnuph
11-01-2009, 04:47 PM
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7819230.stm

mandy1231
14-01-2009, 01:30 AM
http://www.internationalbasketball.com/paintings-basketball-johnrobertson.jpg

Barmi
16-01-2009, 07:51 PM
The first appellant chief constable appealed against a decision ([2007] EWCA Civ 325, [2007] 1 W.L.R. 1821) that the police had been under a duty to take preventive measures to protect a witness who was being threatened and who was subsequently murdered, and that they were in breach of that duty and therefore acted incompatibly with the European Convention on Human Rights 1950 art.2 . The second appellant chief constable appealed against a decision ([2008] EWCA Civ 39, [2008] H.R.L.R. 23) that a claim in negligence against the police arising from an allegation that they had failed to take necessary steps after being informed of death threats against an individual should not have been struck out. The cases involved two victims (G and S). G had been murdered just days before he was due to give evidence for the prosecution at the trial of a defendant (B) on charges of theft. B was convicted of G's murder. G's parents alleged that G's murder by B had occurred after a number of threats and incidents of witness intimidation by B against G and others of which the investigating police officer (R) should have been aware and which should have led him to take steps to protect G against the risk of serious harm. According to S, he had repeatedly informed the police that his former partner (P) had threatened to kill him, the police had ample evidence and information to arrest P and they had no excuse for not doing so. While the police were investigating the matter, P attacked S with a claw-hammer, causing serious injuries. In bringing proceedings against the respective chief constables, G's parents relied on art.2 of the Convention, while S's claim was brought under the common law. The issue was whether the Court of Appeal had been correct to reach the two decisions that it had.
Appeals allowed. (Lord Bingham dissenting in respect of S's case) (1) (Per Lord Hope) As to the art.2 claim brought by G's parents, the relevant test was set out by the Strasbourg court in Osman v United Kingdom (23452/94) [1999] 1 F.L.R. 193 ECHR. Under the test, the court had to be satisfied that the authorities knew or ought to have known "at the time" of the existence of "a real and immediate risk to the life" of an identified individual from the criminal acts of a third party. If they failed to take measures within the scope of their powers which, judged reasonably, might have been expected to avoid that risk, the relevant positive obligation would have been violated. In G's case, that test had not been met. The murder had been the action of a seriously disturbed and unpredictable individual, and it could not reasonably be said that R should have anticipated, from the information available to him at the time, that B constituted a risk to G's life that was both real and imminent. It had been argued that by involving G in B's prosecution, in particular by requesting him to be a witness at B's trial, the police had exposed him to a risk to his life, thereby placing him in a special category of witnesses, not shared by all members of the public, to whom a lower threshold applied. However, the test in Osman was invariable and was not intended to impose a standard which might vary from case to case, Osman applied. (2) (Per Lord Hope) As to S's claim in negligence, the balance of advantage in this difficult area lay in preserving the principle set out in Hill v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire [1989] A.C. 53 HL, whereby, in the absence of special circumstances, the police owed no common law duty of care to protect individuals against harm caused by criminals. In Brooks v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [2005] UKHL 24, [2005] 1 W.L.R. 1495 Lord Nicholls of Birkenhead said that there might be exceptional cases where the circumstances compelled the conclusion that the absence of a remedy sounding in damages would be an affront to the principles that underlay the common law. That approach was to be respected, but S's case did not fall into that category. That was why, if a civil remedy was to be provided, there needed to be a more fundamental departure from the core principle in Hill. That should be resisted, in the interests of the wider community, Hill and Brooks followed. (3) (Per Lord Bingham) The Court of Appeal had been right to decide as it had in S's case. If a member of the public (X) furnished a police officer (Y) with apparently credible evidence that a third party whose identity and whereabouts were known presented a specific and imminent threat to his life or physical safety, Y would owe X a duty to take reasonable steps to assess such threat and, if appropriate, take reasonable steps to prevent it being executed.



Reason: Needed to copy and paste a headnote.

camera
16-01-2009, 07:53 PM
holy cow callum LOL


http://www.createblog.com/tutorials/tutorial.php?id=13080

TETRIS.exe
16-01-2009, 11:49 PM
Hábbóx

Lol

Andys
17-01-2009, 12:06 AM
:(:(

......lol

TETRIS.exe
19-01-2009, 09:10 PM
http://images.icanhascheezburger.com/completestore/2009/1/15/128765421442304048.jpg

An evil bunny from icanhascheezburger.com look like a rabbid LMAO :P

Xarea
25-01-2009, 01:00 AM
Power ballad

lmao for gcse music.

Imnotpure
29-01-2009, 03:05 PM
1


hmm..

Xarea
31-01-2009, 11:04 PM
220e7e27b4b6987dbe1fa01faddd06c4156f4123

Urnuph
01-02-2009, 12:09 AM
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7862378.stm

nicool
05-02-2009, 09:35 PM
my friends email address.
she wont appreciate me posting it.

9y
07-02-2009, 01:08 PM
rofl&lt;rofl&lt;rofl&lt;rofl&lt;rofl&lt;rofl&lt;rofl&lt;rofl&lt;rofl&lt;rofl&lt; rofl&lt;rofl&lt;rofl&lt;rofl&lt;rofl&lt;rofl&lt;rofl&lt;rofl&lt;rofl&lt;rofl&lt; rofl&lt;rofl&lt;rofl&lt;rofl&lt;rofl&lt;rofl&lt;rofl&lt;rofl&lt;rofl&lt;rofl&lt; rofl&lt;rofl&lt;rofl&lt;rofl&lt;rofl&lt;rofl&lt;rofl&lt;rofl&lt;rofl&lt;rofl&lt; rofl&lt;rofl&lt;rofl&lt;rofl&lt;rofl&lt;rofl&lt;rofl&lt;rofl&lt;rofl&lt;rofl&lt; rofl&lt;rofl&lt;rofl&lt;rofl&lt;rofl&lt;rofl&lt;rofl&lt;rofl&lt;rofl&lt;rofl&lt; rofl&lt;rofl&lt;rofl&lt;rofl&lt;rofl&lt;rofl&lt;rofl&lt;rofl&lt;rofl&lt;rofl&lt; rofl&lt;rofl&lt;rofl&lt;rofl&lt;rofl&lt;rofl&lt;rofl&lt;rofl&lt;rofl&lt;rofl&lt; rofl&lt;rofl&lt;rofl&lt;rofl&lt;rofl&lt;rofl&lt;rofl&lt;rofl&lt;rofl&lt;rofl&lt; rofl&lt;rofl&lt;rofl&lt;rofl&lt;rofl&lt;rofl&lt;rofl&lt;rofl&lt;rofl&lt;rofl

Lol?

Barmi
12-02-2009, 08:06 PM
wonders if anyone has a Hall ticket for sale?

Zak
13-02-2009, 12:29 AM
Gaandu

LMAO

James!
13-02-2009, 12:30 AM
RE: Hello stranger!‏

scott
13-02-2009, 12:44 AM
*it was split or steal
*so i was like whispering other dude
*saying we split both get a prize
*he said k
*and said split
*and i stole lollllllll

:D

Samantha$
20-02-2009, 08:41 PM
http://www.anime4f.com/2007/09/pokemon-episode-26.html (http://www.anime4f.com/2007/09/pokemon-episode-26.html)


*REMOVED* ok yes i still watch pokemon peeps


Edited by Yoshimitsui (Forum Super Moderator): Please do not avoid the filter.

visa.
04-04-2009, 04:52 AM
file:///C:/Users/HIJASO%7E1/AppData/Local/Temp/moz-screenshot-1.jpg

camera
04-04-2009, 07:08 AM
http://www.tehupload.com/uploads/14464806bc4fbf1Image1.png

Toughened
08-04-2009, 11:00 PM
Nothing lol.

Havoline
08-04-2009, 11:55 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ynjIoymWHvU

PoizZoNxX
09-04-2009, 12:00 AM
C:\windows\resources\themes\royale noir

Urnuph
09-04-2009, 12:25 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0fY8bHc53qY

Blinger1
09-04-2009, 02:32 AM
09-04-2009 08:55 AM

Want to hide these adverts? Register an account for free!