PDA

View Full Version : Today's Prem Fixtures



Clowgon
21-02-2009, 08:46 AM
Arsenal (http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/a/arsenal/default.stm) v Sunderland (http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/s/sunderland/default.stm), 15:00
Aston Villa (http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/a/aston_villa/default.stm) v Chelsea (http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/c/chelsea/default.stm), 12:45
Bolton (http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/b/bolton_wanderers/default.stm) v West Ham (http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/w/west_ham_utd/default.stm), 15:00
Man Utd (http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/m/man_utd/default.stm) v Blackburn (http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/b/blackburn_rovers/default.stm), 17:30
Middlesbrough (http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/m/middlesbrough/default.stm) v Wigan (http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/w/wigan_athletic/default.stm), 15:00
Stoke (http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/s/stoke_city/default.stm) v Portsmouth (http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/p/portsmouth/default.stm), 15:00


Arsenal v Sunderland - 2-2
Aston Villa v Chelsea - 3-1
Bolton v West Ham - 0-3
United v Blackburn - 4-2
Middlesbrough v Wigan 1-1
Stoke v Portsmouth 1-2


;)

Minstrels
21-02-2009, 08:49 AM
Arsenal v Sunderland - 2:0
Aston Villa v Chelsea - 0:3
Bolton v West Ham - 1:0
United v Blackburn - 2:0
Middlesbrough v Wigan 0:2
Stoke v Portsmouth 1:0



You've put Villa down as a win? And a very large one at that?

Last time I checked Chelsea have a new manager.

Clowgon
21-02-2009, 08:59 AM
Arsenal v Sunderland - 2:0
Aston Villa v Chelsea - 0:3
Bolton v West Ham - 1:0
United v Blackburn - 2:0
Middlesbrough v Wigan 0:2
Stoke v Portsmouth 1:0



You've put Villa down as a win? And a very large one at that?

Last time I checked Chelsea have a new manager.


Yes because Chelsea have just had a new Manager i doubt that they have the confidence and the self-esteem to go on and win today.

Minstrels
21-02-2009, 09:04 AM
Yes because Chelsea have just had a new Manager i doubt that they have the confidence and the self-esteem to go on and win today.
It always works the other way around. Chelsea will go out in force and look to impress, they'll have added confidence.

Look at Portsmouth, Blackburn and Spurs.

Clowgon
21-02-2009, 09:19 AM
It always works the other way around. Chelsea will go out in force and look to impress, they'll have added confidence.

Look at Portsmouth, Blackburn and Spurs.

Well looks like we'll have to wait and see. :)

Portsmouth and Blackburn haven't got back to their winning ways yet but i absolutely agree with you there with Spurs. As soon as Ramos left and Harry took over, they really started to play good football and importantly started to win games.

Minstrels
21-02-2009, 09:23 AM
Well look we'll have to wait and see. :)

Portsmouth and Blackburn haven't got back to their winning ways yet but i absolutely agree with you there with Spurs. As soon as Ramos left and Harry took over, they really started to play good football and importantly started to win games.
But they all earned points in the first game under the new manager.

Captain
21-02-2009, 09:33 AM
Arsenal v Sunderland - 2-0
Aston Villa v Chelsea - 0-1
Bolton v West Ham - 0-0
United v Blackburn - 2-0
Middlesbrough v Wigan 2-1
Stoke v Portsmouth 1-1

Clowgon
21-02-2009, 09:38 AM
But they all earned points in the first game under the new manager.


Yes but that does NOT mean Chelsea will win.

I mean look at Blackburn's first game with Sam. Blackburn v Stoke, 3-0 Blackburn. I hardly call that a hard first game. If you look at the squad that Blackburn has and if you look at the squad what Stoke has, you would of put the bet on Blackburn to win the match.

But with Chelsea, new Manager and everything, they have Aston Villa, a great set of players with a great Manager, if this future was 7 or nine mouths ago with then i would say Chelsea for the win.

I don't really think Chelsea will be back to their old winning ways until a few games, or maybe you never know, new tactics obvs and they may suit it and adapt to it quite quickly.

Minstrels
21-02-2009, 09:58 AM
Yes but that does NOT mean Chelsea will win.

I mean look at Blackburn's first game with Sam. Blackburn v Stoke, 3-0 Blackburn. I hardly call that a hard first game. If you look at the squad that Blackburn has and if you look at the squad what Stoke has, you would of put the bet on Blackburn to win the match.

But with Chelsea, new Manager and everything, they have Aston Villa, a great set of players with a great Manager, if this future was 7 or nine mouths ago with then i would say Chelsea for the win.

I don't really think Chelsea will be back to their old winning ways until a few games, or maybe you never know, new tactics obvs and they may suit it and adapt to it quite quickly.

Stoke 2:3 Everton
Liverpool 0:0 Stoke
Stoke 0:2 Chelsea
Stoke 0:0 Spurs
Stoke 2:1 Arsenal
Stoke 1:1 Hull
Stoke 0:1 Manure
Stoke 0:0 Liverpool
Chelsea 2:1 Stoke
Stoke 1:0 Manchester City

Easy game? Naive.

Throne Sofa
21-02-2009, 10:11 AM
My predictions:

Arsenal (http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/a/arsenal/default.stm) v Sunderland (http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/s/sunderland/default.stm) - 2-1
Aston Villa (http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/a/aston_villa/default.stm) v Chelsea (http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/c/chelsea/default.stm), - Sadly, 3-1.
Bolton (http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/b/bolton_wanderers/default.stm) v West Ham (http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/w/west_ham_utd/default.stm), - 1-1.
Man Utd (http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/m/man_utd/default.stm) v Blackburn (http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/b/blackburn_rovers/default.stm), 2-0.
Middlesbrough (http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/m/middlesbrough/default.stm) v Wigan (http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/w/wigan_athletic/default.stm), 1-2.
Stoke (http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/s/stoke_city/default.stm) v Portsmouth (http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/p/portsmouth/default.stm), 2-0.

Wootzeh
21-02-2009, 10:47 AM
Stoke 2:3 Everton
Liverpool 0:0 Stoke
Stoke 0:2 Chelsea
Stoke 0:0 Spurs
Stoke 2:1 Arsenal
Stoke 1:1 Hull
Stoke 0:1 Manure
Stoke 0:0 Liverpool
Chelsea 2:1 Stoke
Stoke 1:0 Manchester City

Easy game? Naive.
Omg we beat Aston Villa 3-2 at home too thanks!!

Arsenal v Sunderland - 3-0
Aston Villa v Chelsea - 1-2
Bolton v West Ham - 2-2
United v Blackburn - 2-0
Middlesbrough v Wigan 0-0
Stoke v Portsmouth 2-0

The Undertaker
21-02-2009, 10:59 AM
Arsenal v Sunderland - 2-0
Aston Villa v Chelsea - 2-2
Bolton v West Ham - 0-1
United v Blackburn - 3-1
Middlesbrough v Wigan 0-0
Stoke v Portsmouth 0-1

Bun
21-02-2009, 11:45 AM
** it, i'm phoning in sick. got a good feeling bout today.

Brody
21-02-2009, 11:49 AM
Predictions =

Arsenal (http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/a/arsenal/default.stm) v Sunderland (http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/s/sunderland/default.stm) - 2-0
Aston Villa (http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/a/aston_villa/default.stm) v Chelsea (http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/c/chelsea/default.stm), - 1-1
Bolton (http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/b/bolton_wanderers/default.stm) v West Ham (http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/w/west_ham_utd/default.stm), - 1-2
Man Utd (http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/m/man_utd/default.stm) v Blackburn (http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/b/blackburn_rovers/default.stm)- 2-0
Middlesbrough (http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/m/middlesbrough/default.stm) v Wigan (http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/w/wigan_athletic/default.stm), 1-2.
Stoke (http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/s/stoke_city/default.stm) v Portsmouth (http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/p/portsmouth/default.stm), 0-1

Andys
21-02-2009, 03:15 PM
cisse's not even on the bench :S:S:S:S

Jack.Lfc
21-02-2009, 04:34 PM
Pompey winning stoke :lol:

PENALTY FOR STOKE

1-1

STOKE WINNING 2-1

Andys
21-02-2009, 04:57 PM
hahaha at everyone predicting a big win for arsenal
all over, 0-0
good result lads :D

AlexOC
21-02-2009, 06:04 PM
Haha 1-1 Utd.

Where's Your Clean Sheets Gone :eusa_danc

mangle
21-02-2009, 06:06 PM
Kuzack in net?
Oh dear.
1-1.

Clowgon
21-02-2009, 06:52 PM
WHAT A GOAL BY RONALDO!! :D

Antallica
21-02-2009, 07:10 PM
Im sorry but, That was a penalty. Rafael blatently pulled Pederson down. If that would of been a United player running through, the penatly would have been given. Ronaldo should be off, his kick out and his dive.

Alot of deicisons go in united's favour.

Jack.Lfc
21-02-2009, 07:15 PM
Im sorry but, That was a penalty. Rafael blatently pulled Pederson down. If that would of been a United player running through, the penatly would have been given. Ronaldo should be off, his kick out and his dive.

Alot of deicisons go in united's favour.

What do you expect? one again the ref has bottled it.

Antallica
21-02-2009, 07:16 PM
I think there all scared of Fergie giving them a mouthful.

Jack.Lfc
21-02-2009, 07:23 PM
The commentators are too far up their arse aswell.

Antallica
21-02-2009, 07:25 PM
Yea, they always are. Every commentator seem to go on about United 24-7.
Howard Webb, YOUR A PLEB >_<!

Jack.Lfc
21-02-2009, 07:27 PM
Does there conciding record end? or does it carry on cos van da sar wasnt in goal?

Antallica
21-02-2009, 07:30 PM
They will make up excuses.

Like
Doesnt count,
VAN DER SAR WASNT IN GOAL.

United will win the title now tbh.
Its embarrasing for United tbh, because RONALDO 'the supposive best player in the world' has to dive to get goals.

Wootzeh
21-02-2009, 07:31 PM
Does there conciding record end? or does it carry on cos van da sar wasnt in goal?
It's ended, it lasted 1,337 minutes.

Clowgon
21-02-2009, 07:49 PM
The commentators are too far up their arse aswell.

I know! Commentators were completly biased today.

--ss--
21-02-2009, 08:02 PM
Was dissapointing :(.

busybabes
21-02-2009, 08:06 PM
antallica your embarrassing.

you support like 4 differant teams

Jack.Lfc
21-02-2009, 08:20 PM
antallica your embarrassing.

you support like 4 differant teams

Just got home from the game?

busybabes
21-02-2009, 08:23 PM
i didnt go

Wootzeh
21-02-2009, 08:24 PM
i didnt go
Why not?

busybabes
21-02-2009, 08:41 PM
i had work unlike you kids

Andys
21-02-2009, 08:47 PM
i had work unlike you kids
PART-TIME SUPPORTER!!!!
:D

Antallica
21-02-2009, 09:10 PM
antallica your embarrassing.

you support like 4 differant teams

I'd rather like 4 teams than support Man Utd.
I like 4 teams, i dont support them
I just love football.


Btw, do you SUPPORT man utd? or do you even go?

And btw
Off Topic: you've had 96 posts this month already?
Sheesh, your sad. Posting at work are you?

busybabes
21-02-2009, 10:02 PM
7 posts a day is hardly no lifing

you like 4 teams :lol: what a muppet you are. what are you going to do what Bolton play CIty? support both teams and hope for a good match? prat

Antallica
21-02-2009, 10:11 PM
Well mate, i'd enjoy the football as i always do.

Throne Sofa
21-02-2009, 10:56 PM
I actually find some of you lot embarassing. You expect every football supporter to go to every single match, whatever the circumstances. Some don't understand that we're in a time of financial difficulty, and not everyone can be paying £50 each week on personal leisure. There seems to be a sub-culture in this forum where if you don't go to matches frequently, you're not a "true" supporter. Complete and utter ********.

busybabes
21-02-2009, 11:37 PM
I actually find some of you lot embarassing. You expect every football supporter to go to every single match, whatever the circumstances. Some don't understand that we're in a time of financial difficulty, and not everyone can be paying £50 each week on personal leisure. There seems to be a sub-culture in this forum where if you don't go to matches frequently, you're not a "true" supporter. Complete and utter ********.
well said

Geraint
21-02-2009, 11:41 PM
considering leicester have one of the cheapest tickets in the football league. :eusa_whis

Throne Sofa
21-02-2009, 11:43 PM
considering leicester have one of the cheapest tickets in the football league. :eusa_whis
That's irrelevent. I'm sure in most cases, work is more important than football. It is what keeps the food on the table and a roof over your head.

busybabes
21-02-2009, 11:46 PM
throne sofa ignore him

he supported arsenal last year when they were top of the league and then suddenly changed to cardiff.

Geraint
22-02-2009, 12:02 AM
throne sofa ignore him

he supported arsenal last year when they were top of the league and then suddenly changed to cardiff.

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:


Cardiff fan for over 10 years and I watch game, more than can be said for some.

Cisse9
22-02-2009, 12:07 AM
well said

What he said is not targetted at the man utd fans, just the real 'fans'

who have probably never been to a man ure match.

:rolleyes:

Throne Sofa
22-02-2009, 12:14 AM
No it was targeted at those on this forum who brag about every single match they go to, and hunt down those who don't go to for reasons they do not know.

Jack.Lfc
22-02-2009, 12:17 AM
Im going to my first game tomorrow i'm a super fan.

Geraint
22-02-2009, 12:27 AM
No it was targeted at those on this forum who brag about every single match they go to, and hunt down those who don't go to for reasons they do not know.

We don't brag about games we're going to. You find that's the plastics.

Bun
22-02-2009, 12:46 AM
I actually find some of you lot embarassing. You expect every football supporter to go to every single match, whatever the circumstances. Some don't understand that we're in a time of financial difficulty, and not everyone can be paying £50 each week on personal leisure. There seems to be a sub-culture in this forum where if you don't go to matches frequently, you're not a "true" supporter. Complete and utter ********.
i have to agree to an extent. i find it annoying that i have to brag about going to games in order show i'm a true fan? it's not that i don't always think "football first" cos i do, ask my girlfriend lmao :eusa_whis, but sometimes other things come into the equation.

Wootzeh
22-02-2009, 12:48 AM
i have to agree to an extent. i find it annoying that i have to brag about going to games in order show i'm a true fan? it's not that i don't always think "football first" cos i do, ask my girlfriend lmao :eusa_whis, but sometimes other things come into the equation.
Why do you have to brag about going to games :S

Bun
22-02-2009, 12:57 AM
Why do you have to brag about going to games :S
sorry i meant that I feel I need to, because some idiots on here think if you don't have a season ticket you aren't a true fan.

Clowgon
22-02-2009, 09:20 AM
sorry i meant that I feel I need to, because some idiots on here think if you don't have a season ticket you aren't a true fan.

I know, it's absolutely ridiculous.

"If you don't go to the games you're not a fan" What kind of nonsense is that?

As i said I'm only 15. When I'm older enough to work and to drive i will be going to the united games much more often.

Want to hide these adverts? Register an account for free!