Blatter could scrap offside rule

[StefanWolves]

http://www.skysports.com/story/0,19528,11095_5998444,00.html

i hope this man dies.

[Mexel]

He is always talking about somthing about someone, thinking he is 'the don' or slagging off us. The guys a ****.

[Browney]

More goals, a more open game... BUT, I do think it'd be a bad idea.

[StefanWolves]

IF you abolish off side then what formation will be played? 0-0-10? or just stick the two strikers on the edge of the box.

[United-Clowgon]

This will NEVER happen.

[Geraint]

Get in, we'll win every game. Bothroyd will have a field day. :eusa_danc

[CHA!NGANG]

It would probably be good for us as we can pass through the defence without worrying about being offside but it is a **** idea and would ruin football imo.

[Browney]

They'd probably just assign each team member to another.

[Pyroka]

That'll make defenders work for their money at least lol.

[Suspective]

It won't happen.

[Oleh]

in hockey i doubt a offside rule could be activley enforced efficiently as the play is too fast paced, but it football there is no need to abolish it.

[Arch]

I doubt it'll happen although I think it'd be funny if it did :P

[AlexOC]

I've never agreed with offside, it was brought in to stop goal hangers but its really annoying when your player gets caught offside for like a centimetre!

I say scrap it!

[luce]

lol that's stupid the only reason that works in hockey is because it's faster and more technical. The whole tactics of football would have to be changed to suit this. No way should this go ahead.

[iAdam]

in hockey i doubt a offside rule could be activley enforced efficiently as the play is too fast paced, but it football there is no need to abolish it.

Hockey offsides are easy to enforce, if someone in the opposite team is over the blue line before the puck is over the line, they're offside, faceoff on the line as a result.

I doubt this will happen in football, it adds something to the game, yes we moan about it, but hey ho, it's one of those things.