Euro 2024 sweepstakes!
Prizes to be won this summer! Click here to take part, and find yourself a team to cheer on!
Show your pride!
Rainbows galore in our forum shop, including snazzy colours for your username and even a rainbow-coloured... football?
Join Habbox!
Be part of the Habbox family - there are so many roles to pick from! Click here to get your application rolling


Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234
Results 31 to 36 of 36
  1. #31
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Essex
    Posts
    23,585
    Tokens
    9,258

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by :Cerys View Post
    Well, don't blame me for getting it wrong. Blame my teacher who got great grades in law at uni! If I'm going on what I've ben taught, loss of control could be used, but as I said earlier its unlikely that it would be allowed.

    Obviously he has the actus reus as the woman is dead due to his actions, whether it be through intent or recklessness.
    Oh no I'm not saying you're wrong. I'm not saying I am right either! Law isn't as black and white as I'm sure you know It could well be mentioned, but with the details of the event it's going to be difficult to suggest it was loss of control

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    5,600
    Tokens
    12,584
    Habbo
    :Cerys

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    I do see your point. Also, apologies if it seems snappy, didn't mean it to be!

    Yeah, I completely see where you're coming from now I've read it over a few times.
    Last edited by Cerys; 14-02-2013 at 11:20 PM.





  3. #33
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Essex
    Posts
    23,585
    Tokens
    9,258

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by :Cerys View Post
    Wont let me edit that^^

    I do see your point. Also, apologies if it seems snappy, didn't mean it to be!
    No worries. The whole point of law seems to be to snap at each other, and see who is the most convincing.

    It would be interesting to see what comes of this case. The details of what may have happened seem rather vague at the moment.

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    9,888
    Tokens
    26,298
    Habbo
    Zak

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sex View Post
    unfortuante advert timing
    lmao fail

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    5,600
    Tokens
    12,584
    Habbo
    :Cerys

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GommeInc View Post
    No worries. The whole point of law seems to be to snap at each other, and see who is the most convincing.

    It would be interesting to see what comes of this case. The details of what may have happened seem rather vague at the moment.
    Haha yes I suppose so!

    I think I would go for unlawful act manslaughter as it would be hard to prove that he had intended to kill her - where did he actually shoot her? As I guess what will prove intent or not.





  6. #36
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Essex
    Posts
    23,585
    Tokens
    9,258

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by :Cerys View Post
    Haha yes I suppose so!

    I think I would go for unlawful act manslaughter as it would be hard to prove that he had intended to kill her - where did he actually shoot her? As I guess what will prove intent or not.
    Manslaughter does seem likely. He's charged with murder and if there is strong evidence against him he could only try and reduce the conviction to voluntary manslaughter if they can prove he intended to hurt her but not kill her. As you said, loss of control would make it voluntary manslaughter (provocation). If he was waving the gun around and accidentally shot her, he could try for involuntary manslaughter but he will have to try hard to fight for that

Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •