Oh the hilarity. The only reason the world hates the usa is because you all think it's your given right to police the world. What right did you have to go into iraq? What right did you have to go into afghanistan? Pakistan? Syria?
Conductor of the Runaway Train of Militant Homosexuality
They have every right - someone needs to stop these unstable countries from doing whatever they want.. god knows what warheads they have
Cos everytime we touch, I get this feeling, and everytime we kiss I swear I could fly, can't you feel my heart beat fast, I want this to last, need you by myside
Oh I'm sorry.. you see to be saying "you" too much.
You don't understand, when we went into Iraq.. it wasn't just our forces.. your forces were right beside us, backing us up!
What right did you have to go along with us?The 2003 invasion of Iraq, from March 20 to May 1, 2003, was spearheaded by the United States, backed by British forces and smaller contingents from Australia, Poland and Denmark.
Hmm, you sent 45,000 troops in.. what right did you have to do that?Four countries participated with troops during the initial invasion phase, which lasted from March 20 to May 1. These were the United States (250,000), United Kingdom (45,000), Australia (2,000), and Poland (194).
So quit blaming the USA for everything, when the UK was pretty much involved in it highly too.. ha.The invasion marked the beginning of the current Iraq War.
Oh I'm sorry.. I forgot.. you have the right to go in, but we don't.According to the President of the United States George W. Bush and former Prime Minister of the United Kingdom Tony Blair, the reasons for the invasion were "to disarm Iraq of weapons of mass destruction (WMD), to end Saddam Hussein's support for terrorism, and to free the Iraqi people." Blair said the actual trigger was Iraq's failure to take a "final opportunity" to disarm itself of nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons that U.S. and coalition officials called an immediate and intolerable threat to world peace.
Oh the hilarity. :rolleyes:
Last edited by Dentafrice; 29-10-2008 at 09:36 PM.
LOL. Unstable, the worst they could do is attack surrounding countires. You seriously think there is a real threat from any of these places? And at above, i know but that's becaue our government has its head shoved up bush' arse.
Conductor of the Runaway Train of Militant Homosexuality
The right that they believed they have Weaps of Mass Dest.
Coz they can @ the rest.
The only reason is the west wanted to control oil reserves in the middle east..
Conductor of the Runaway Train of Militant Homosexuality
And those surrounding countries, that are small and can't defend themself, rely on us to help protect them.
And if you "know" this, then quit blaming the USA, when your country was just as much a part of it. Hypocrite.
Laughing my ass off, if you believe that.. you my friend are an idiot.
We're not controlling any of the ******* oil reserves, if we were.. gas wouldn't have been $4.95 a gallon!
You don't see us shipping out barrels of oil from there, or troops stationed at their oil reserves.. or us even ******* near them.
Oh yes.. we want to control their oil reserves! That's why we have planes loaded up with it bringing it to the USA..
That's a load of ********.
I suppose you're one of those people that think muslims are violent terrorists too... When i was in the USA i could not believe how backwards and biast the news was . Seriously... you seem to all think socialism is communism, that liberals are bad and that pakistan is full of terrists (quoting from good mornign america)
Conductor of the Runaway Train of Militant Homosexuality
Are you saying there not?I suppose you're one of those people that think muslims are violent terrorists too... When i was in the USA i could not believe how backwards and biast the news was . Seriously... you seem to all think socialism is communism, that liberals are bad and that pakistan is full of terrists (quoting from good mornign america)
Are you saying it isn't?
Want to hide these adverts? Register an account for free!