stop.habbox.com

[scottish]

pretty sure hxstatus isn't hosted on same server anyway

[HarrySX]

the number of sites isn't an issue... deleting the wiki etc won't do anything as they're not resource intensive websites. they just have a lot of data stored and storage is cheap

the reason hxf has a big server will be due to the main website and forum which will both munch on CPU - costs can't be decreased. if costs do need to be decreased, it means removing the forum

nope

[xxMATTGxx]

pretty sure hxstatus isn't hosted on same server anyway

I was talking about the main Habbox sites

[scottish]

I was talking about the main Habbox sites

was replying to other post saying get rid of hxstatus

[edible]

the number of sites isn't an issue... deleting the wiki etc won't do anything as they're not resource intensive websites. they just have a lot of data stored and storage is cheap

the reason hxf has a big server will be due to the main website and forum which will both munch on CPU - costs can't be decreased

my knowledge on server capacity / efficiency / costing is limited. what i'm asking is, could habbox make any alterations so they don't munch on cpu

[Kieran]

http://kuss.me/ is also on it

[HarrySX]

my knowledge on server capacity / efficiency / costing is limited. what i'm asking is, could habbox make any alterations so they don't munch on cpu

yes -- a lot. but it wouldn't be worth it and the reduction in CPU usage would be minimal. $300 really isn't a lot of money considering both HxF and hx.com are on the same server

trust me

[edible]

yes -- a lot. but it wouldn't be worth it and the reduction in CPU usage would be minimal. $300 really isn't a lot of money considering both HxF and hx.com are on the same server

trust me

yeah but if the options were close habbox or cost cutting - is habbox as efficient as it can be?

[sex]

http://kuss.me/ is also on it

http://kuss.me/?page_id=11

that harry guy is hot
DOES HE KNOW ABOUT HXF

Edited by Lee (Forum Super Moderator): Please don't post pointlessly.

[HarrySX]

yeah but if the options were close habbox or cost cutting - is habbox as efficient as it can be?

habbox probably is as efficient as can be with the resources available, Tom (the tech manager) knows what he is doing, i know that more than anybody here

if it came to it somebody would put up the cash, but if Jin is working full time $300 is hardly much... besides, somebody else would happily put up the money (myself included if need be)