Which political view is best for Britain?

[-:Undertaker:-]

lol wat. that article is explaining what the differences are in an in depth manner. It isnt concerned with bias against this or that just an informative article from people who've actually read the Communist Manifesto.

And your saying I ignore things!:eusa_danc

The article is from a marxist view, its like a pro-EU site could explain the European Union in full depth - doesn't mean anything it says is truthful. The only real difference that article points out is how the stage of capitalism should be moved away from, the article is complete tripe as I would expect from a Marxist article/site.

The article is rubbish, infact it even states that the two are basically the same on the full transition to communism; "Socialism is the first step in the process of developing the productive forces to achieve abundance and changing the mental and spiritual outlook of the people. It is the necessary transition stage from capitalism to communism."

If you do not think they are anywhere near the same, why then did the Communist Party rule the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics and not the Union of Soviet Communist Republics?

[alexxxxx]

as for those talking about poverty, i haven't had personal experience, though I see those from the poorer areas of town and you can tell they obviously don't eat right or enough, the housing is dreadful and it looks very difficult to better themselves. a sort of social-poverty.

[-:Undertaker:-]

as for those talking about poverty, i haven't had personal experience, though I see those from the poorer areas of town and you can tell they obviously don't eat right or enough, the housing is dreadful and it looks very difficult to better themselves. a sort of social-poverty.

Those areas (I know type you mean) tend to be post-war housing, the new towns which were built in the 1950s/1960s and have failed basically and damaged larger cities such as Liverpool as populations were taken away from the inner city. I think with areas like those they need investment which can be taken away from other areas (burocrats, European Union - anything really.. there loads of areas where funding could be diverted to areas such as these) and work with local business to grow there.

It is a shame they were ever built really, many victorian houses which could of been returned to former grandeour were destroyed leaving brownfield sites in citys across the United Kingdom. Liverpool is going to continue to suffer for decades to come as other cities populations keep rising, Liverpools is expected to stay the same until the 2030s all because of those new towns.

It can be difficult to better yourself when in a situation like that, but it all comes down to getting out there and doing it, especially when it comes down to financial management because debts are often what hold the ones who want to work back.

[Nxrissa]

um im confussed ll