counterproductive moderation.

[GoldenMerc]

moderator logs
Yeh but im fairly sure if you did 0 logs per week Scott wouldn't be too happy with you correct?

[Lee]

moderator logs
Yeh but im fairly sure if you did 0 logs per week Scott wouldn't be too happy with you correct?

What about if there was no rule breaking posts though?

Edit; When I say none I mean in the moderators section, not forum overall

[GoldenMerc]

What about if there was no rule breaking posts though?

Then make a arguement, i don't know im not the moderator
There must be some way for Scott to know your working, some sort of reports obviously

[Jordan]

moderator logs
Yeh but im fairly sure if you did 0 logs per week Scott wouldn't be too happy with you correct?

Ofcourse it is picked up on weekly if we're too low or not but no one in the department is furiously searching constantly to try and get the most logs. All edits are absolutely fine, just because there are many in one thread doesn't mean we are doing it to try and get the most logs, it is because it needs to be edited.

[Zuth]

lol yeah. last week i got edited just to change a prefix, when it was already correct.
& I had the filter one too.

As Chris said, it had the prefix 'Help' when it was quite clearly a 'How To' even @brandon agreed with me when he finally understood

[beth]

As Chris said, it had the prefix 'Help' when it was quite clearly a 'How To' even @brandon agreed with me when he finally understood

does it really matter that much though?!

@scott i guess you aren't seeing the pm's cause they come from myke rather than the mod team, i'll speak to you about it. i think my greatest gripe is the pointless posting which the moderators seem to take as ANY post that doesn't refer to the original point in hand, even posts replying to the other posters in the thread about something they have maybe brought up gets taken as pointless. i would agree that it was pointless if it was like someone just posting "lol" half way through a thread, but it's very rarely that.

loledit: just tagged you as "sct" hahahah.

[Zuth]

does it really matter that much though?!

@scott i guess you aren't seeing the pm's cause they come from myke rather than the mod team, i'll speak to you about it. i think my greatest gripe is the pointless posting which the moderators seem to take as ANY post that doesn't refer to the original point in hand, even posts replying to the other posters in the thread about something they have maybe brought up gets taken as pointless. i would agree that it was pointless if it was like someone just posting "lol" half way through a thread, but it's very rarely that.

loledit: just tagged you as "sct" hahahah.

Does it matter so much that he had to post it in the first place?

[scott]

does it really matter that much though?!

@scott i guess you aren't seeing the pm's cause they come from myke rather than the mod team, i'll speak to you about it. i think my greatest gripe is the pointless posting which the moderators seem to take as ANY post that doesn't refer to the original point in hand, even posts replying to the other posters in the thread about something they have maybe brought up gets taken as pointless. i would agree that it was pointless if it was like someone just posting "lol" half way through a thread, but it's very rarely that.

loledit: just tagged you as "sct" hahahah.

Well if that's the case then they are moderating incorrectly, I haven't noticed it myself though. I will make a thread for the moerators to remind them of the rule and how it should be moderated.

A7. Do not post pointlessly ~ ~ Do not post off-topic ~ An off-topic post has no relevance to the topic or any previous post that is relevant, or does little to positively contribute to the discussion.

[beth]

Does it matter so much that he had to post it in the first place?

what the guide? i think every thread matters when the forum is lacking posts.
@scott i think sometimes they stick so rigidly to the rules it's very hard to move from it even with the rules being explained clearly. a little initiative is sometimes required, i believe. if someone replies to somebodys post that may NOT be with the original topic but is replying to the 2nd posters point that is still positively contributing to discussion? that's how i see it anyway. i may be wrong but i would rather have the following:

e.g:

poster1: i really like fanta but i think coke is so much nicer. what's yr opinion of fanta?

poster2: you like coke more? even with the all the extra bad stuff?

poster3: "quotes poster2" lol but poster2 you said you loved coke the otherday why the sudden change.

RATHER THAN.

poster1: i really like fanta but i think coke is so much nicer. what's yr opinion of fanta?

poster2: you like coke more? even with the all the extra bad stuff?

poster3: "quotes poster2" EDITED PLS DNT POST POINTLESSLY.

[Chris]

does it really matter that much though?!

@scott i guess you aren't seeing the pm's cause they come from myke rather than the mod team, i'll speak to you about it. i think my greatest gripe is the pointless posting which the moderators seem to take as ANY post that doesn't refer to the original point in hand, even posts replying to the other posters in the thread about something they have maybe brought up gets taken as pointless. i would agree that it was pointless if it was like someone just posting "lol" half way through a thread, but it's very rarely that.

loledit: just tagged you as "sct" hahahah.

Can you provide some evidence of this if possible?

what the guide? i think every thread matters when the forum is lacking posts.

I think he was referring to Dave posting this. http://www.habboxforum.com/showthrea...26#post7458526