If the firing was for repeated leaks then again you'd still have no staff left so the whole mistake thing still doesn't really fit with this. There was either a big leak (and there is no evidence backing this up seen as no-one has a clue what said information was and if it was big news, it'd have definitely been spread out) or it was an over-reaction.
I was replying to I-can't-remember-who's post that it can't have been something major or it what was leaked would have been spread over Habbox by now.
If there is a leaking situation then as the person being leaked to, I'd just tell the people in charge and nothing else. Don't like creating gossip for gossip's sake, especially when the lovely members of Habbox turn it into such a negative and personal attack.
so you can list...
a feature that gives you coloured names on a forum.
and a website that takes away views from the main website because they were too lazy to incorporate it in to the main website
the technology forum would miss me though so many people in need of help (pretty much the only reason i use the forum)
The point is, leaking, ESPECIALLY as a manager, is against the rules. Rules aren't hard to follow. IMO everyone who leaks something important (can usually get away with saying odd things or leaking the 'jokes' that happen in manager's chat etc) should face the consequences.
But how do we know he was fired for leaking info? Clearly somebody leaked that?I was replying to I-can't-remember-who's post that it can't have been something major or it what was leaked would have been spread over Habbox by now.
If there is a leaking situation then as the person being leaked to, I'd just tell the people in charge and nothing else. Don't like creating gossip for gossip's sake, especially when the lovely members of Habbox turn it into such a negative and personal attack.
Thanks for your time, very dedicated staff member!
If I was general manager and I knew that people in high positions were leaking things, I'd fire them all.If the firing was for repeated leaks then again you'd still have no staff left so the whole mistake thing still doesn't really fit with this. There was either a big leak (and there is no evidence backing this up seen as no-one has a clue what said information was and if it was big news, it'd have definitely been spread out) or it was an over-reaction.
Lazy? Hell no. The information on the wiki is so different to the main site. So much more depth, on a massive range of topics. I'm not launching into a defense on it with you though...so you can list...
a feature that gives you coloured names on a forum.
and a website that takes away views from the main website because they were too lazy to incorporate it in to the main website
the technology forum would miss me though so many people in need of help (pretty much the only reason i use the forum)
and I swear I haven't seen you make a single post recently (in the last year) that was actually useful....
Yes. But it's not necessarily the leakee - as it hasn't been said what he was leaking. It's almost definitely another manager due to recent posts in our subforum, but it's hard to prove who at the moment!
Want to hide these adverts? Register an account for free!