Yeah, the way you should have worded it is by actually replying to what I wrote
Also probably shouldn't try lumping me in with everyone else just because more than one person disagrees with you, especially when I personally have not been involved in any of the things you're accusing "you guys" of having said or done. There was absolutely no reason to have my post quoted if you weren't addressing me
Interesting you say that because if I don't post quote back then I'll get yelled at.Also probably shouldn't try lumping me in with everyone else just because more than one person disagrees with you, especially when I personally have not been involved in any of the things you're accusing "you guys" of having said or done. There was absolutely no reason to have my post quoted if you weren't addressing me
Going to leave. Getting offtopic and pointless now.
I spend so much time wondering this. No1 would need to arm themselves if guns were not available at all. I suppose most crazy gun lovers are just incapable of even beginning to imagine a place where there are no guns?I find that it is impossible to reason with american gun lovers
like obviously if they weren't allowed to buy guns at the local corner shop then there would be less gun violence but the response is ALWAYS "but if we can't arm themselves then there would be more gun violence!!11"
but if there were no guns to buy then there would be less gun crime
y u no understand :frust: