8 things you didn't know about HxHD
Who was the first manager? When did it open? Find out the answers to these and more amazing facts about one of Habbox's oldest departments!
Join our team today
Whether you're into helping others, writing, playing some tuuunez, or hosting events, join our lovely & friendly team today.
Rare value updates!
Hey big spender! Wanna see what your coins can buy you? Come and check out Habbo's most comprehensive rare values reports, and find yourself a treat!


Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    2,573
    Tokens
    10,794
    View Awards

    Default Should cigarettes be banned?




    Should cigarettes be banned altogether?

    There is no positive results from smoking, it harms the individual as well as others around them, known as passive smoking, or second-hand smoking.
    It was merely only slightly over a decade ago (July 2007) that smoking in a public places was made illegal, prior to July 2007, you were allowed to smoke in restaurants, and other various public places.

    Then in 2015 it became illegal to smoke in a vehicle where children under the age of 18 were present.
    It is proven that second-hand smoking can and does cause lung cancer and other such diseases associated with smoking.

    Most would agree that it's not fair that non-smokers are being diagnosed and in some cases are dying from the effects of smoking cigarettes, yet it is the people around them and their choice to smoke that has resulted in their health problems/death.

    As cigarettes are taxed heavily in the UK, it does make a lot of money for the government, but does the money gained outweigh the money spent treating all the effects of smoking, not to mention money spent on sweeping up cigarette butts, and putting out fires caused by cigarettes, and people who are off work ill from the effects of smoking, causing lost productivity and loss of tax revenue for the time they weren't working.

    Imagine a patient in her 40s who is diagnosed with terminal cancer as a result of her smoking. Let's say her care costs the NHS £20,000 before she passes away. Now imagine we could go back in time and prevent her from taking up smoking in the first place. She might live into her 80s, and even if she spends that time in relatively good health is likely to require any number of GP consultations and routine prescriptions in that time.


    If her treatment over these decades costs any more than £20,000 then actually the NHS would have spent less had she been a smoker. Source
    Is the above quote how we want to look at the world? Wouldn't we as a society rather people live longer and fuller lives, rather than hoping they die sooner so it doesn't cost us more in tax?

    What are your thoughts?

    Please note this may only be relevant to UK residents, I'm unaware of any laws in other countries.




    THIS DEBATE ENDS ON THE 4th APRIL

    For more information on the debate guidelines and how to win prizes see the guidelines thread here
    Last edited by Sectional; 08-03-2020 at 03:18 PM.



    I deserve to be alright, I deserve to sleep at night
    I'm my closest friend, I remind myself again
    Better treat him well, cause he's with me till the end


    I'm not senDing sublimInal messagEs to rule breakers

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    2,573
    Tokens
    10,794
    View Awards

    Default

    This debate is now open!



    I deserve to be alright, I deserve to sleep at night
    I'm my closest friend, I remind myself again
    Better treat him well, cause he's with me till the end


    I'm not senDing sublimInal messagEs to rule breakers

  3. #3
    -:Undertaker:-'s Avatar
    -:Undertaker:- is offline Habbox Hall of Fame Inductee
    Former Rare Values Manager
    HabboxForum Top Poster


    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Liverpool, Britain
    Posts
    25,735
    Tokens
    2,449
    View Awards

    Default

    No.

    If we're going to start policing health, should we regulate food and drink? Sugar intake? Exercise regime? There's no end to it. The cigarette campaign originally was well intended, as obviously it isn't a healthy habit. But neither is eating kebab, getting pissed on a friday night and laying in bed all day. Yet we do it because it is up to us as individuals what we do, not the government. Strangely enough, the same people who are so anti-tobacco always seem to be pro-cannabis which always puzzles me.

    Likes Alkaz liked this post

  4. #4
    sexpot is offline Forum Moderator / Help Desk Manager

    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    3,380
    Tokens
    18,729
    View Awards

    Default

    no, because I think that is the right of the consumer to choose what they do to their bodies. Like Dan said, what’s next on the list since we banned cigarettes? alcohol is plenty dangerous and the government seems to be in no rush to ban it, same with junk fast food
    Last edited by sexpot; 09-03-2020 at 02:19 AM.

    We part, only to meet again. 12/11/04

  5. #5
    cameron446:'s Avatar
    cameron446: is offline Content Designer
    HabboxLive Senior DJ (Music)
    Guest Events Organiser
    Competitions Staff

    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Posts
    1,359
    Tokens
    2,103
    View Awards

    Default Should cigarettes be banned?

    I agree with Dan and Emily’s point plus the government would not ban alcohol or cigarettes because there making money. I feel the worse thing in the UK is alcohol tbh as people’s moods can change once they’ve had a drink, I feel that would be the first thing they should be looking at banning rather then cigarettes yes they cause harm but in the end you dint see people getting arrested everything weekend do you. Also like dan said a lot of people I know from college and outside won’t smoke a cigarette but smoke weed like I think it’s absolutely funny because tobacco is in the joint they are smoking. Also anything of too much can be unhealthy it depends on the individual what they want to do with there life in the end like a person who drinks lots of water could even drown there lungs so it just depends on the amount of intake you take at the end of the day and make sure everything is in moderation.
    Last edited by cameron446:; 09-03-2020 at 09:04 AM.

    HabboxLive Senior DJ

    We are always looking for new DJ's for the HabboxLive Team, PM me for more information.

    Likes Jarkie liked this post

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    England
    Posts
    7,219
    Tokens
    9,867
    View Awards

    Default

    I don't think they should be banned either but for an entirely different reason.

    How **** difficult would it be to enforce such a ban? They're SUCH a widespread thing you're just giving the police so much more frivolous work to do... it's impossible to enforce properly and you're just setting up law enforcement attempts to be a joke lol. Stop bothering banning something that you can't police and focus law, crime, punishment & policing on more important things.
    Likes cameron446: liked this post

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    2,573
    Tokens
    10,794
    View Awards

    Default

    I'm actually against banning too, mainly because like stated above, it'll be literally impossible to enforce, plus where would you draw the line, plus I honestly don't think it effects me that much to care what others do to their body, however for the purpose of this debate, I'll switch sides and ask questions as such, purley to stimulate conversation

    Quote Originally Posted by -:Undertaker:- View Post
    No.

    If we're going to start policing health, should we regulate food and drink? Sugar intake? Exercise regime? There's no end to it. The cigarette campaign originally was well intended, as obviously it isn't a healthy habit. But neither is eating kebab, getting pissed on a friday night and laying in bed all day. Yet we do it because it is up to us as individuals what we do, not the government. Strangely enough, the same people who are so anti-tobacco always seem to be pro-cannabis which always puzzles me.
    Sugar in-take is already half regulated, in a sense... UK introduced the sugar tax on drinks such as Coke, and anything that's refillable for free has to be diet, or zero sugar.
    Although eating a kebab isn't exactly the healthiest thing in the world, it's not often a thing people eat 2-3+ times a day, whereas smokers DO smoke that many times a day, or more, as with getting drunk, most people at best go on a night out 1-2 times a week (some even once a month) whereas with smokers you know it's almost a guarantee that they'll be smoking a few cigarettes a day.

    Quote Originally Posted by sexpot View Post
    no, because I think that is the right of the consumer to choose what they do to their bodies. Like Dan said, what’s next on the list since we banned cigarettes? alcohol is plenty dangerous and the government seems to be in no rush to ban it, same with junk fast food
    As above... MOST people only go out drinking once a week (thereabouts) and junk food is often moderated in most households (Things such as McDonalds etc) therefore the dangers are a lot less than people who smoke right? Besides, as bad as junk food and alcohol is for you, they actually serve other purposes, such as giving you energy and ensuring you don't starve to death.. Whereas cigarettes serve no purpose do they? Perhaps apart from reducing stress levels? (Idk, I'm not a smoker)

    Quote Originally Posted by cameron446: View Post
    I agree with Dan and Emily’s point plus the government would not ban alcohol or cigarettes because there making money. I feel the worse thing in the UK is alcohol tbh as people’s moods can change once they’ve had a drink, I feel that would be the first thing they should be looking at banning rather then cigarettes yes they cause harm but in the end you dint see people getting arrested everything weekend do you. Also like dan said a lot of people I know from college and outside won’t smoke a cigarette but smoke weed like I think it’s absolutely funny because tobacco is in the joint they are smoking. Also anything of too much can be unhealthy it depends on the individual what they want to do with there life in the end like a person who drinks lots of water could even drown there lungs so it just depends on the amount of intake you take at the end of the day and make sure everything is in moderation.
    I agree, alcohol can be worse in that sense, don't really hear these days that 2 people got in a fight who were under the influence of tobacco lol. I have no counter argument for this haha. It'll come down to which costs the NHS more, alcohol related incidents (Along with costs for Police call-outs) or lung related illnesses due to smoking?

    Quote Originally Posted by Empired View Post
    I don't think they should be banned either but for an entirely different reason.

    How **** difficult would it be to enforce such a ban? They're SUCH a widespread thing you're just giving the police so much more frivolous work to do... it's impossible to enforce properly and you're just setting up law enforcement attempts to be a joke lol. Stop bothering banning something that you can't police and focus law, crime, punishment & policing on more important things.
    True, impossible to ban really, especially when people are addicted to them, if it were to happen then they would need a 10-15 year plan to help people off of it, and instead ban people from ever starting... though not sure how they'd regulate that...



    I deserve to be alright, I deserve to sleep at night
    I'm my closest friend, I remind myself again
    Better treat him well, cause he's with me till the end


    I'm not senDing sublimInal messagEs to rule breakers
    Likes cameron446: liked this post

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Canberra, Australia
    Posts
    359
    Tokens
    1,378
    View Awards

    Default

    How much freedom do you want the government to take away from you? That's my response. Maybe they should double the tax on cigerettes if it doesn't outweigh the healthcare costs. lmao
    Add me on Discord Philip Vels#0001

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO