HabboxWiki needs you!
Are you a Habbo buff? Or maybe a rare trader with a bunch of LTDs? Get involved with HabboxWiki to share your knowledge!
Join our team!
Whether you're raving for rares, excited for events or happy helping, there's something for you! Click here to apply
Need a helping hand?
Check out our guides for all things to help you make friends, make rooms, and make money!


Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 51

Thread: Human Evolution

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    498
    Tokens
    0

    Default

    There is a simple answer to this thread that will fit MOST cases.

    Are you more religous or Scientific?

    I, being more religous believe that we did NOT evolve from apes.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    11,283
    Tokens
    2,031

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Genifer
    I don't know about the creation theory.

    I really have thought hard about this, and I think their both THEORYS. It's not certain how humans came to be.

    I'm not sure about evoloution.. their's not enough EVIDENCE.
    There probly a few hunderd ensclopedas full of proof, its not acatly a thery, its proven scinace?

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    498
    Tokens
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mentor
    There probly a few hunderd ensclopedas full of proof, its not acatly a thery, its proven scinace?
    I don't think so.

    Notice the saying, "Darwin's Theory"

    After watching a video, it explains how many parts of the cell there are now that Darwin could not even imagine at the time of his theory.

    It also shows how complex the cell is and that the chances of evolution is VERY slim.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    11,283
    Tokens
    2,031

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    dawins thery was quite a whiel ago, sintist afetr him dindt suddenly ignore the subject, dawins thery did have some gaps, wich are now filled by the sciance of gentitcs wich explaisn inhertce, the only thing he got grossy inccorect.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    498
    Tokens
    0

    Default

    This is not much on my last posts, but I feel that high school science should not ONLY teach evolution, but give different opinions so that everyone's opinion is heard and not just the Scientific one they are cramming in our ears.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    11,283
    Tokens
    2,031

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    But the sintific one is correct, and proven. thats would be like teching 2 plus 2 . but then saying teh amswer coudl also be, 3 and 5. even thogh the only corect one is 4

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    498
    Tokens
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mentor
    But the sintific one is correct, and proven. thats would be like teching 2 plus 2 . but then saying teh amswer coudl also be, 3 and 5. even thogh the only corect one is 4
    Not quite.

    There are no other "theorys" to what 2+2 could be.

    There is for the creation of mankind.

    Some say evolution.

    Soem say a God or any other religous leader.

    I am just saying that schools should touch on the subject that there is more than one opinion.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    11,283
    Tokens
    2,031

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    there may be someoen of teh opion 2 + 2 = 3 . but peopel know its incorrect, so they dont teach it.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    498
    Tokens
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mentor
    there may be someoen of teh opion 2 + 2 = 3 . but peopel know its incorrect, so they dont teach it.
    Yes, but they would need proof to back it up.
    There is ABSOLUTELY no way that 2+2 could = 3.

    There is a way that evolution could be false though.

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    11,283
    Tokens
    2,031

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Corey777
    Yes, but they would need proof to back it up.
    There is ABSOLUTELY no way that 2+2 could = 3.

    There is a way that evolution could be false though.
    evoltion is a proven and genraly accepted, way in wich life eveolves, its can be proven countless ways, and explaisn innumrable things. Many poople would say thers abosulty no way evelition could be wrong

Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •